Articles

In-depth writing on communication, psychology, learning, and AI literacy. These articles explore ideas, frameworks, and insights drawn from my work and learning.

Featured Articles

The Layer That’s dominating: Google’s Android Automotive Operating System

Software has become the central point around which the hardware revolves in vehicles.

Android’s Automotive Operating System (AAOS) now controls almost everything inside the car, except for the Electronic Control Units (ECUs), which manage safety systems, sensors, battery, and internal climate control. These are governed by firmware, and each ECU has its own firmware, which tells the hardware what to do.

For years, the focus was only on the projection layer, which is the connection between our smartphones and cars. Vehicles "mirrored" certain apps and features. It was a lightweight relationship, as simple as flicking a switch. Here, Android Auto and Apple’s CarPlay are still key players. Today, the emphasis has advanced to the Operating System (OS) taking up more space and control. It's now the host and reaches into maintenance, interiors, seating, Artificial Intelligence (AI) integration as well. That’s a plus!

Earlier, automakers built the hardware and then integrated the software. With AAOS, this order has flipped. Software has become central to how car parts are designed, updated or revamped to remain compatible with the OS.

Shipping remains the same, but the pressure on the automakers has lifted. They no longer need to create their own infotainment systems from scratch. But this comes at the cost of full control, even if the established brand identity gets an edge by using AAOS. Changes or updates travel from the company to the car's OS via three channels: the Google Play Store, manual installations by the automakers or, an obvious choice of over-the-air updates (OTA).

This mirrors the seamlessness we expect from our phones, as this integration replicates the convenience, familiarity, and reliability, now with cars. You can talk to your AI assistant while driving or while taking a cab to a nearby cafe, and it feels natural.

But this raises a question: does this integration reduce the automaker's control and make them dependent? With technology and artificial intelligence becoming embedded in everything we use, the answer isn't straightforward. But there is an interesting point where the automaker is behind the OS it uses, and that’s where Tesla comes in, its operating system is built in-house and tightly integrated with its vehicles. Google’s system, however, is distributed across various automakers, from Polestar to Ford, Nissan, Hyundai, and more.

Compatibility, certification, and integration challenges do come with the territory. Development is ongoing; whether it's oil changes or software updates, the gears are always turning.

Until next time.

Signals, Pairing, and the Human Connection

“I want to send you a file," she said, and via a simple tap on the Bluetooth option, her phone began to search for her friend's device. It was a sunny day, but that digital, wordless connection, this tiny transition in a split second made the moment feel warmer.

What a paradox it is, a connection so quick yet isolating when proximity is absent. The distance we once cherished never loses its meaning, and I personally value it. This technology mirrors what we do and want: the pairing, the attachments, the disconnect. But what it cannot replicate is the complexity of all this, the time it takes in real life, the lessons we gather, the outcomes our lives produce. The real and the virtual create their own physical and emotional shifts. Yet this wide gap between them remains unavoidable.

Discoverability, or even the thrill of exploration, seems exciting and satisfying when we find what we want on the very first try. But when the search stretches on, the same process can turn irritating or make us abandon it altogether. At times we are made invisible on purpose or we may want to hide, and that can stem from self-protection, privacy, sabotage, or many other reasons.

The strength of any connection can depend on various factors, such as shared interests, similarities, closeness, or what one finds appealing, and yet interference can halt it at the very beginning or even after it has been established. Some are quick to connect, some take time and space, and some connections need to be tended to, to keep these alive.

Once in touch, this pairing leads to an exchange of content, ideas, and opinions that can deepen the connection, surface differences, or even move people toward a shared goal. But even to get in touch in the first place, there has to be consent; no connection can do away with it. Pairing and connection may be considered distinct terms in Bluetooth technology, but for humans they sit much closer together, involving mutual openness, recognition, repeated exchanges, and above all, the investment of the most vital resource we have: time spent on another.

Rest assured, not every signal becomes a link or bond, and sometimes that is for the best.

Interference can occur at any time. Sometimes these bonds can withstand the test of time, and at other times, interference may target a newly budded pairing. It can stem from internal sources, shaped by one's own beliefs about themselves or others; the familiar idea of preconceived notions suits this well, and it highlights the influence of past experience. At other points, it can be external, where priorities take a turn; the noise and distractions become amplified enough to pull your attention away, or countless competing signals are directed at the new connection.

Endings can be hard or beautiful. A disconnect may leave a hollow space or create room for the next best thing; it may even rekindle the energy for a reunion, expected or unexpected. Auto-connect serves as a reminder that the source of connection never ended in the first place, only the connection did for a while, altered by changing conditions, so to speak.

The way a device connects to another device is by determining the range in between. The same is true for us, though our range is observable in more than distance. It encompasses levels such as mental, emotional, and circumstantial, while shaping the boundaries that determine how close a connection can stay and for how long.

The connection between people may never be as quick as the one between devices, but ours carries more weight, lasts longer, and can be paused or nurtured for the better. What matters is whether we feel and know that we are replenished or drained by it, and this goes both ways.